<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CrowdSpring.com Vs. 99Designs.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoexpert.tv/do-it-yourself-seo/crowdspring-vs-99designs.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoexpert.tv/do-it-yourself-seo/crowdspring-vs-99designs.html</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization Tips from an SEO Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:07:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.seoexpert.tv/do-it-yourself-seo/crowdspring-vs-99designs.html/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoexpert.tv/?p=125#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I tried using crowdspring twice with very poor experience. The customer service sucked. I tried communicating 4 times, they switched reps and withdrew my project rather than posting it in the correct category which completely screwed up my deadline. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried using crowdspring twice with very poor experience. The customer service sucked. I tried communicating 4 times, they switched reps and withdrew my project rather than posting it in the correct category which completely screwed up my deadline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get a Good Logo &#8211; Your Best Options</title>
		<link>http://www.seoexpert.tv/do-it-yourself-seo/crowdspring-vs-99designs.html/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Get a Good Logo &#8211; Your Best Options</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoexpert.tv/?p=125#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] This has become a good option with the rising popularity of sites like 99designs, Hatchwise, Crowdspring, and Designers Contest become fairly popular with the. Here are some comparisons of a few services. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This has become a good option with the rising popularity of sites like 99designs, Hatchwise, Crowdspring, and Designers Contest become fairly popular with the. Here are some comparisons of a few services. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorna Li</title>
		<link>http://www.seoexpert.tv/do-it-yourself-seo/crowdspring-vs-99designs.html/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorna Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoexpert.tv/?p=125#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used them both and have had it on my radar to write a comparative post at some point in my busy life. 
 
99Designs is great for the bootstrap entrepreneur. You can state a rock bottom price and some designer somewhere will bid on it. You have better controls over your contest end date - say you get busy and need to extend your contest - you can do it in 99Designs but with Crowdspring you have to email customer support every time. I like the 99Designs contest interface better - it is easier to view and compare designs from one designer. Crowdspring&#039;s design view is too small, so if you have a large website design, you still need to have the designers submit an external link so you can hone in on the details. 
 
Crowdspring is better for the enterprise level - you get templated contracts and NDAs. You can launch a private contest but this requires a minimum project cost, which ends up being US market rate, and prohibitive to bootstrap entrepreneurs. Crowdspring guarantees a minimum 25 entries or your money back, and appear to have a better system for alerting designers to your project, even if it is a private project, than 99Designs. In 99Designs, for private contests, you have to manually contact individual designers or no one will come. 
 
I think both services could improve their designer search functionality - to be able to search designers by website versus graphic, and tags (green, sports, women&#039;s) will help companies better ID the right designer for their project. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve used them both and have had it on my radar to write a comparative post at some point in my busy life.</p>
<p>99Designs is great for the bootstrap entrepreneur. You can state a rock bottom price and some designer somewhere will bid on it. You have better controls over your contest end date &#8211; say you get busy and need to extend your contest &#8211; you can do it in 99Designs but with Crowdspring you have to email customer support every time. I like the 99Designs contest interface better &#8211; it is easier to view and compare designs from one designer. Crowdspring&#39;s design view is too small, so if you have a large website design, you still need to have the designers submit an external link so you can hone in on the details.</p>
<p>Crowdspring is better for the enterprise level &#8211; you get templated contracts and NDAs. You can launch a private contest but this requires a minimum project cost, which ends up being US market rate, and prohibitive to bootstrap entrepreneurs. Crowdspring guarantees a minimum 25 entries or your money back, and appear to have a better system for alerting designers to your project, even if it is a private project, than 99Designs. In 99Designs, for private contests, you have to manually contact individual designers or no one will come.</p>
<p>I think both services could improve their designer search functionality &#8211; to be able to search designers by website versus graphic, and tags (green, sports, women&#39;s) will help companies better ID the right designer for their project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

